The Impact of the Cosurgeon Model on Bilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Abstract

Background Microsurgical breast reconstructions (MBRs) are time and labor intensive procedures. To circumvent these barriers, plastic surgeons have started working together as cosurgeons (CSs). This study aims to evaluate the impact of the CS model (CSM) specifically on bilateral MBR. The hypothesis is that CS procedures reduce operative time and surgical complications.

Study Design This was a single institutional retrospective cohort study, which included all consecutive patients who underwent bilateral MBR from 2014 to 2016. Patients were grouped into single surgeon (SS) or CSs based on the number of the attending plastic surgeons present. Demographic and clinical characteristics including age, body mass index, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, radiation, and the timing of the reconstruction were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for outcomes including operative time and postoperative complications.

Results Of the 136 patients included in the study, 41% had breast reconstruction performed by CSs, whereas 59% had a SS. Sociodemographic features were evenly distributed with the exception of a greater number of delayed reconstructions in the SS group (33 vs. 13%; p <0.01). Pedicle TRAMS (transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps) were performed in 5 versus 0% of SS versus CS cases, respectively. Rates of major (4 vs. 16%) and minor (11 vs. 24%) complications were significantly lower in CS procedures. Multivariate analyses demonstrated CS operations required significantly shorter operative time by 73 minutes (p <0.001), and trended toward a reduced postoperative complication rate (p = 0.07).

Conclusion The CSM is associated with improved operative efficiency for bilateral MBR. Further evaluation of the CSM may prove useful in other surgical disciplines with time and labor intense procedures.

Keywords

microsurgical breast reconstruction - bilateral autologous breast reconstruction - cosurgeon model

Note

The abstract of this study was presented at the Annual Meeting of American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, January 2017, Waikoloa Village, HI.

^* Both the authors contributed equally to this study.

• References

• 1 Kwok AC, Goodwin IA, Ying J, Agarwal JP. National trends and complication rates after bilateral mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2012. Am J Surg 2015; 210 (03) 512-516
• 2 Kulkarni AR, Sears ED, Atisha DM, Alderman AK. Use of autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (03) 534-541
• 3 Zhong T, Hu J, Bagher S. , et al. A comparison of psychological response, body image, sexuality, and quality of life between immediate and delayed autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective long-term outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (04) 772-780
• 4 Albornoz CR, Matros E, Lee CN. , et al. Bilateral mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: the role of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (06) 1518-1526
• 5 Dragun AE, Pan J, Riley EC. , et al. Increasing use of elective mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic surgery among breast conservation candidates: a 14-year report from a comprehensive cancer center. Am J Clin Oncol 2013; 36 (04) 375-380
• 6 Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF, Shyr Y, Hooks MA. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 2015; 150 (01) 9-16
• 7 Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (33) 5203-5209
• 8 Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB. , et al. Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (09) 1362-1367
• 9 Halanski MA, Elfman CM, Cassidy JA, Hassan NE, Sund SA, Noonan KJ. Comparing results of posterior spine fusion in patients with AIS: are two surgeons better than one?. J Orthop 2013; 10 (02) 54-58
• 10 Ludwig AT, Inampudi L, O'Donnell MA, Kreder KJ, Williams RD, Konety BR. Two-surgeon versus single-surgeon radical cystectomy and urinary diversion: impact on patient outcomes and costs. Urology 2005; 65 (03) 488-492
• 11 Aloia TA, Zorzi D, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN. Two-surgeon technique for hepatic parenchymal transection of the noncirrhotic liver using saline-linked cautery and ultrasonic dissection. Ann Surg 2005; 242 (02) 172-177
• 12 Mallory MA, Losk K, Camuso K, Caterson S, Nimbkar S, Golshan M. Does “two is better than one” apply to surgeons? Comparing single-surgeon versus co-surgeon bilateral mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (04) 1111-1116
• 13 Takatsuki M, Eguchi S, Yamanouchi K. , et al. Two-surgeon technique using saline-linked electric cautery and ultrasonic surgical aspirator in living donor hepatectomy: its safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 2009; 197 (02) e25-e27
• 14 Gösseringer N, Mani M, Cali-Cassi L, Papadopoulou A, Rodriguez-Lorenzo A. Benefits of two or more senior microsurgeons operating simultaneously in microsurgical breast reconstruction: experience in a Swedish medical center. Microsurgery 2016
• 15 Weichman KE, Lam G, Wilson SC. , et al. The impact of two operating surgeons on microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 277-284
• 16 Bauermeister AJ, Zuriarrain A, Newman M, Earle SA, Medina III MA. Impact of continuous two-team approach in autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (04) 298-304
• 17 Procter LD, Davenport DL, Bernard AC, Zwischenberger JB. General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210 (01) 60-5.e1 , 2
• 18 Bekelis K, Coy S, Simmons N. Operative duration and risk of surgical site infection in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2016; 94: 551-555 e6
• 19 Kim JY, Khavanin N, Rambachan A. , et al. Surgical duration and risk of venous thromboembolism. JAMA Surg 2015; 150 (02) 110-117
• 20 Nwaogu I, Yan Y, Margenthaler JA, Myckatyn TM. Venous thromboembolism after breast reconstruction in patients undergoing breast surgery: an American College of Surgeons NSQIP analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220 (05) 886-893
• 21 Abedi N, Ho AL, Knox A. , et al. Predictors of mastectomy flap necrosis in patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction: a review of 718 patients. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (06) 629-634
• 22 Daley BJ, Cecil W, Clarke PC, Cofer JB, Guillamondegui OD. How slow is too slow? Correlation of operative time to complications: an analysis from the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220 (04) 550-558
• 23 Wong AK, Joanna Nguyen T, Peric M. , et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with microvascular free flap failure using a multi-institutional database. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (01) 6-12
• 24 Turrini O, Delpero JR. Two surgeons for one pancreas. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78 (12) 1140-1141
• 25 Mochizuki K, Eguchi S, Hirose R, Kosaka T, Takatsuki M, Kanematsu T. Hemi-hepatectomy in pediatric patients using two-surgeon technique and a liver hanging maneuver. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17 (10) 1354-1357
• 26 Dimou FM, Eckelbarger D, Riall TS. Surgeon burnout: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222 (06) 1230-1239
• 27 Bentz ML. The plastic surgeon at work and play: surgeon health, practice stress, and work-home balance. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (10) e1081
• 28 Nguyen PD, Herrera FA, Roostaeian J, Da Lio AL, Crisera CA, Festekjian JH. Career satisfaction and burnout in the reconstructive microsurgeon in the United States. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (01) 1-5
• 29 Chaput B, Bertheuil N, Jacques J. , et al. Professional burnout among plastic surgery residents: can it be prevented? Outcomes of a national survey. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 75 (01) 2-8
• 30 Qureshi HA, Rawlani R, Mioton LM, Dumanian GA, Kim JY, Rawlani V. Burnout phenomenon in U.S. plastic surgeons: risk factors and impact on quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (02) 619-626
• 31 Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Occup Behav 1981; 2: 99-113
• 32 Streu R, Hansen J, Abrahamse P, Alderman AK. Professional burnout among US plastic surgeons: results of a national survey. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (03) 346-350